Lederartikkel i Aftenposten, med debatt, se KIlkde.
"Han har ingen rett til å dra med seg flere i krigen"
Min kommentar 1
Min kommentar 2:
Frispark ... og innkast. Tanker om ting i tiden.
Lederartikkel i Aftenposten, med debatt, se KIlkde.
Min kommentar 1
Det var Israel som presset USA til å bli med på bombingen.
Og det er Israel som nå eskalerer ved å bombe Irans gassanlegg,noe USA har avstått fra.
Det er liten tvil om hvem som styrer showet, og vil ha mer kaos, der MØ-landene kriger med hverandre.
Min kommentar 2:
Mens USA og Iran forhandlet ... så planla Israel bombing.
Og gjennomførte det da forhandlingene var i sluttfasen.
Det samme skjedde i Qatar under forhandlingene der med Hamas.
Da var USA uforberedt , og kjeftet på Netanyahu.
Men denne gangen MÅTTE USA stille opp, å drepe toppledelsen i Iran var så drøyt ... mens man forhandlet.
Nå har Israel valgt å ØKE krigsnivået ved å bombe Irans gassanlegg.
Opplegget er klassisk, skap splid og dermed mer krig.
Et MØ der Gulfstater kriger mot hverandre er for noen en ønskedrøm.
Min kommentar 3:
Du skrev:
"Israel bombet gassanlegget etter støtte fra USA."
Kommentar:
Trump sier motsatt.
Han legger skylden på Netanyahu.
Og logikk tilsier at Trump har rett, han ønsker ikke eksplosjon i energipriser. Da taper han valged ...
Netanyahu derimot, han ønsker at MØ-landene skal krige mot hverandre. Da vinner han valget ...
Skudeneshavn 19. mars 2026
Jan Marton Jensen
Kilde:
19. mars 2026
https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/leder/i/d4R0oO/trump-kan-ikke-true-andre-land-til-aa-vaere-med-i-krig-de-ikke-stoetter
Debatt i Haugesunds Avis om Kommunesammenslutning
Min kommentar
Kilde:
16. mars 2026
https://www.h-avis.no/38-prosent-er-klart-negative-til-sammenslaing-vi-ma-heller-se-pa-grensejusteringer-og-samarbeid/s/5-62-1992915
klokka 9.38
Her hopper du uelegant over Iran-Contras-skandalen, der Israel etter avtale med USA leverte våpen til Iran.
Irangate viste Reagans handlemåte. En av de verste presidentene, uten kontroll med det som foregikk.
Carter var av et helt annet kaliber hva gjelder MØ-politikk, og var den som satte dagsorden i Israel-Palestina-konflikten.
Les deg opp på "Camp David Accords"
Merkelig at dette innlegget skal modereres.
Oppdatering:
Er lagt inn etter ca 20 minutter
Skudeneshavn 18. mars 2026
Jan Marton Jensen
Kilde:
17. mars 2026
https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/i/2p5VqR/usa-og-israel-historien-laerer-oss-aa-tvile-paa-stormaktenes-motiver
Artikkel i Aftenposten om det som skjedde i Gaza 23. mars 2025, se Kilde
Flere av de palestinske arbeiderne ble henrettet på kloss hold.
Det kommer frem i en ny, uavhengig gransking utført av forskningsgruppene Earshot og Forensic Architecture.
Rapporten bygger på vitneforklaringer, mobilvideoer, lydopptak, satellittbilder og annet åpent kildemateriale.
Slik har forskerne rekonstruert hendelsen natt til 23. mars 2025 digitalt, minutt for minutt.
Ifølge rapporten var ambulansene tydelig merket og hadde utrykningslysene på.
Gjennom analyse av lyd- og videoopptak har forskerne dokumentert minst 910 skudd. Nesten alle, 844, skal ha blitt avfyrt i løpet av fem minutter og 30 sekunder. Minst fem skyttere skjøt samtidig.
Rapporten konkluderer med at israelske soldater lå i bakhold på en høyde med fri sikt mot kjøretøyene. Den mest intense skytingen varte i flere minutter, men hele hendelsesforløpet strakte seg over flere timer.
Fortsettelse i lenken.
Skudeneshavn 18. mars 2026
Jan Marton Jensen
Kilde:
25. februar 2026
https://www.aftenposten.no/verden/i/165BlK/ambulansene-skulle-evakuere-palestinske-saarede-der-ventet-israelske-styrker
Klokka 1652
"Kommentaren din vil være synlig etter moderasjon.
Bildet fylles ut i The Guardian idag:
"UK security adviser attended US-Iran talks and judged deal was within reach
Exclusive: Jonathan Powell thought Tehran’s ‘surprising’ offer on its nuclear programme could prevent rush to war, sources say"
- En avtale med Iran var innen rekkevidde, angis det.
Men NOEN ville det annerledes.
Det er da man forstår Kent sitt valg.
Og hans budskap.
Hvorfor stoppet?
Lagt inn etter ca 40 minutter.
Kommentar 2:
Ganske spesielt at den ENE forhandler, mens den ANDRE planlegger bombing.
Hvis det da oppstår "en unik mulighet" når motparten skal SAMLES på hjemmebanen for å vurdere et forhandlingsopplegg ... har man i så fall lykkes med "forhandlingene"?
Skudeneshavn 17. mars 2026
Jan Marton Jensen
Kilde:
17. mars 2026
https://www.aftenposten.no/verden/i/V6zMgd/kontraterror-sjefen-i-usa-har-sagt-opp-jobben-paa-grunn-av-krigen-i-iran
Aftenposten skriver om dehumanisering:
"Dehumanisering av fienden har en lang og lite stolt historie."
Min kommentar1:
"Dehumanisering av fienden har en lang og lite stolt historie."
Det skriver Aftenposten på Lederplass.
Og peker på Trump, med et aktuelt tilfelle.
Et annet dagsaktuelt tilfelle er frifinnelsen av de som forgrep seg på en Gaza-fange i Sde Teimann- fengselet.
Lederskribenten, som er opptatt av dehumanisering, bør lese dagens artikkel i Haaretz av Gideon Levy.
Der er det nok stoff til en ny Lederartikkel.
Kommentar 2:
Gideon Levy påpeker om Sde Teimann-frifinnelsen:
"From here on, military prison guards are allowed to rip the anus of every prisoner, as long as he is Palestinian, to break his ribs, puncture his lungs. Not only will no harm come to them, they will become heroes"
To ord viser dehumaniseringen: "Become heroes."
Når fangevoktere sine voldelige overgrep med voldtekt, blir gjort til HELTER av landets ledelse, da er dehumaniseringen komplett, ifølge Levy.
Aftenposten sin Lederskribent har en oppgave: Å følge opp denne artikkelen med Levys eksempel.
Dehumanisering er smittsomt når makta rår.
Det må seriøse aviser ta alvorlig.
Minkommentar 3:
LEDERARTIKLER er et kraftig valg for en avis.
Da har man en sak å fokusere på som er viktig, og som avisen ønsker å påvirke.
Noen aviser tar opp i Lederartikler det som er systemsvikt på høyeste nivå i eget hjemland, som her i Haaretz 16. mars 2026:
"Israel Grants Settlers and Soldiers Impunity – and a Palestinian Family Is Shot Dead"
En familie skutt og drept i deres bil, mor far og to barn.
Lederartikkelen i Haaretz fastslår "impunity" ... og peker mot statsledelsen som ansvarlige for at okkupasjonen har denne utglidningen.
Dehumaniseringen har nådd langt når familier slik kan tas ut .. med "impunity".
Haaretz er på banen ... hva med Aftenposten?
Skudeneshavn 15. mars 2026 / 16. mars 2026
Jan Marton Jensen
Kilde:
14. mars 2026
https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/leder/i/pBPKKX/dette-er-usmakelig-selv-til-trump-aa-vaere
15. mars 2026
Gideon Levy
https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2026-03-15/ty-article-opinion/.premium/once-upon-a-time-there-was-a-base-called-sde-teiman-or-was-there/0000019c-ede0-df50-a9de-eff918fc0000
Haaretz 12. mars 2026:
"
"Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz welcomed the decision, saying in a statement that 'justice has been done' and labeling the case a 'blood libel.' Katz added that the IDF legal system's role is to 'defend and protect soldiers who are bravely fighting monsters in war'"
"The Israeli army's senior legal adviser announced Thursday that he has ordered the dismissal of charges against IDF reservists accused of abusing a Palestinian detainee at the Sde Teiman detention facility.
Military Advocate General Itay Offir cited several reasons for his decision, claiming abuse of process due to "the conduct of senior officials in the Military Advocate General's Corps and the IDF's law enforcement system in this case, and its exceptional and unprecedented circumstances."
"Spesiell sak, og ikke nok bevis".
Til tross for at der var videoopptak og lege-erklæringer.
HELE artikkelen i Haaretz:

Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz welcomed the decision, saying in a statement that 'justice has been done' and labeling the case a 'blood libel.' Katz added that the IDF legal system's role is to 'defend and protect soldiers who are bravely fighting monsters in war'
The Israeli army's senior legal adviser announced Thursday that he has ordered the dismissal of charges against IDF reservists accused of abusing a Palestinian detainee at the Sde Teiman detention facility.
Military Advocate General Itay Offir cited several reasons for his decision, claiming abuse of process due to "the conduct of senior officials in the Military Advocate General's Corps and the IDF's law enforcement system in this case, and its exceptional and unprecedented circumstances."
In February last year, five IDF reservists were charged with aggravated abuse and causing severe bodily injury to a Palestinian detainee.
According to the indictment, the five beat the detainee, dragged him along the floor, stepped on his body, and shocked him with a taser. The alleged assault resulted in broken ribs and a punctured lung. The charges also state that one of the soldiers stabbed the detainee in the buttocks, causing rectal injury.
The Sde Teiman detention facility is an IDF base in the Negev Desert in southern Israel. Since the beginning of the Gaza war, the Israeli military has used the base as a temporary detention and interrogation facility for Palestinians captured in Gaza, particularly suspected militants.
In his Thursday decision, the adviser also justified his decision by citing "complexities regarding the existing evidentiary basis" and the release of the security detainee to the Gaza Strip, which raises evidentiary difficulties.
Offir also noted a "procedural difficulty regarding the transfer of relevant investigative materials from a case being handled by the Israel Police, in a way that harms the defendants' right to a fair trial."
The Israeli military also issued a statement, citing "significant developments that have occurred since the filing of the indictment ... and exceptional circumstances that negatively affected the ability to prosecute the case."
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed the decision, saying that "the blood libel ... which slandered Israel in the world in an unprecedented way, has come to an end."
He continued, saying the case was "criminal" in itself, adding it is "unacceptable that it took so long" to close it. "The State of Israel must persecute its enemies, not its heroic fighters," Netanyahu said.
Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz also praised the IDF dropping the charges, saying in a statement that "justice has been done" and labeling the case a "blood libel."
"This trial was born in sin under the previous IDF top lawyer, through what I see as a blood libel against IDF soldiers and the use of abusive investigative methods," he wrote. "I am glad that justice has now been done and the trial has been canceled."
Katz added, "The role of the IDF's legal system is to defend and protect soldiers who are bravely fighting monsters in war – not the rights of Nukhba terrorists," referring to Hamas' elite militants.
According to the military advocate general, footage of the incident "does not present an unequivocal picture of the charges attributed to the defendants," since "the vast majority of the defendants' actions are obscured by shields."
He wrote that "the video alone – certainly when combined with the defense's arguments – does not clearly and incontrovertibly show acts of severe violence at the level required for a criminal conviction, as distinct from the use of force against resistance during a search."
The military advocate general added in his decision that the charges "might have been reinforced by the detainee's testimony." Israel released the detainee to the Gaza Strip in October 2025 as part of the cease-fire and hostage release deal, along with roughly 1,700 other Gazans.
"This new circumstance fundamentally alters the evidentiary basis and makes it difficult to prove significant parts of the indictment," Offir wrote.
Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara and officials from the Justice Ministry and the State Attorney's Office were not involved in the decision to release the detainee to Gaza, despite the potential damage to the case.
A security source said that those who approved the list of detainees slated for release were the government, which received the list in advance, and the Shin Bet security service, which reviewed and approved it.
In a statement released Thursday, the IDF said that Offir dropped the charges due to "extremely exceptional and unprecedented circumstances due to conduct by certain senior officials" in the Military Advocate General's Office.
The Israeli military also said that the unit's "core mission ... is to enforce the law and [hold] accountable those who violate it," adding that the unit "will continue to pursue this mission professionally and independently."
Last October, the IDF announced that it had opened a criminal investigation into the leak of the video showing the assault on a detainee to Channel 12.
Two days after the investigation began, the then-military attorney general, Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi, resigned, admitting that she had approved the leak. In her resignation letter to Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, she explained that she had sought "to fend off false propaganda against law enforcement bodies in the military."
The current military attorney noted, in reference to the right to a fair trial, a recent interview given by an investigator in the case to Kan 11. "During the program, a senior investigator on the investigative team spoke directly, in detail and explicitly, about evidence collected as part of the investigation. The public dissemination of this evidence, while the proceedings against the defendants are still ongoing, fundamentally undermines the defendants' right to a fair trial," he wrote in his decision.
Coalition members welcomed the military attorney's ruling. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich called it an "important decision by Military Advocate General Itay Ophir," adding: "Now it remains only to ensure that the ousted MAG stands trial."
Culture Minister Miki Zohar said that the "blood libel against IDF soldiers was revealed to be nothing at all," while Economy Minister Nir Barkat noted that a fund he established would assist the guards accused in a defamation suit against Channel 12.
Chairman of the Knesset Education Committee Tzvi Sukkot shared a photo of himself during the Sde Teiman base raid in July 2024, following the arrest of the guards, writing: "Glad I was on the right side of history from the very first moment."