Viser innlegg med etiketten Okkupasjon. Vis alle innlegg
Viser innlegg med etiketten Okkupasjon. Vis alle innlegg

lørdag 21. mars 2026

Debatt i Aftenposten om Israels okkupasjon - Mine kommentarer

 Debattinnlegg i Aftenposten om Joe Kent - Mine kommentarer om Israels okkupasjon av palestisnmkre område, se Kilde

 

 Klokka 16.12

Kommentaren din vil være synlig etter moderasjon.
Jan Marton Jensen
svarte Arne Jensen 
for noen sekunder siden

Du skrev:

"Det beste for et land er å leve i fred med omverdenen."

Kommentar:

Ja, og da SLUTTE med en nær 60 år gammel brutal okkupasjon av ANDRES landområde.

Okkupasjon brutaliserer og korrumperer okkupanten.

60 år med økende brudd på Folkeretten er et slett forbilde.

Moderering? Hvorfor?

Lagt inn klokka 16.12
Ikke på nett klokka: 16.15
På plass klokka 16.19 

 

Min kommentar 2:

Jan Marton Jensen
svarte Arne Jensen 
for noen sekunder siden

Du skrev:

"Jeg er ikke enig i at Israel okkuperer "andres" landområde."

Kommentar:

Israelske såkalte "settlere" bryter Folkeretten 4. Geneve-konvensjon 49.6, og er da krigsforbrytere.

Europeiske diplomater erklærer idag at de også er terrorister.

Fra dagens The Guardian:

"European diplomats have criticised increasing “settler terror” in the West Bank, with six Palestinians shot dead in settler attacks in the area this month.

Representatives of 13 European countries including the UK and France issued a joint statement alongside Canada.

It called for Israeli authorities to prosecute those responsible.

It said: “We strongly condemn increasing settler terror and violence by the Israeli security forces inflicted upon Palestinian communities."

.........

Med "settlere" erklært som terrorister av 13 europeiske stater +Canada, da er den rette bjella hengt på den rette katten.

Da gjenstår sanksjoner mot de ansvarlige.

 

Min kommentar 3
22. mars 2026

Jan Marton Jensen
for noen sekunder siden

Lørdagskveld i går på Vestbredden:

Haaretz angir idag:

"Israeli Settlers Set Fire to Buildings, Vehicles Across West Bank; Source: 11 Palestinians Wounded"

"IDF officials said more than 20 settler attacks were reported throughout Saturday night, including hurling stones at Palestinians, spraying grafitti, shooting flares and blocking traffic.

An Israel Police source said no suspects have yet to be arrested"

...........

Netanyahu kriger utenlands.

Ben-Gvir og Smotrich tar seg av Vestbredden.


Min kommentar 4:

Jan Marton Jensen
svarte Jan Marton Jensen 
for fire timer siden

Og så har vi krigsminister Katz:

"'Like in Gaza': Defense Minister Says Israel Will Flatten Homes in Lebanese Border Villages"

.................

Sør-Libanon likesom i Gaza... B&B.

Bomber og Bulldozer.

Og etnisk rensing ...


Min kommentar 5:

Jan Marton Jensen
svarte Jan Marton Jensen 
for noen sekunder siden

Om lørdagskvelden på Vestbredden er ledende israelske politikere KLARE i sine uttalelser, som Yair Golan her idag i Haaretz:

“Jewish terrorism is spreading, exploiting the war, with the backing of extremist ministers and dangerous encouragement from the prime minister and the defence minister. This is a failure of responsibility for Israel’s security.”

"Jødisk terror sprer seg, støttet av ekstremist-ministre og med farlig oppmuntring av statsministeren og forsvarsministeren".

Slik ordlegges det i Israel, av ledende politikere.

Hva tenker ledende politikere i Norge?

Og hva med ledende aviser, som Aftenposten, på lederplass?

 

 Skudeneshavn  21. mars 2026   / 22. mars 2026

Jan Marton Jensen

 

Kilde;
21. mars 2026
https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/kommentar/i/JObAd6/mikropenis-mot-hurpe-maga-krangler-om-israel-saa-fillene-fyker 

søndag 13. april 2025

Debatt i Haugesunds Avis om T-skjorte med poiltisk budskap på Stord - Mine kommentarer

 Debatt i Haugesunds Avis om påkledning i Stord kommunestyre:

"Susan fikk gensernekt: – Det var veldig krenkende"

Min kommentar 1:

Jan Marton Jensen  (redigert)
ICJ i Haag har 19. juli 2024 uttalt seg om Israels brutale 57-årige okkupasjon av palestinske områder, og konkludert at den er ulovlig og må opphøre, ref 4. Geneve-konvensjon 49.6.

Dette ble diskutert i en spesialsesjon i FN 17. september 2024 der Norge  støttet ICJ og uttalte bl.a.:
"This is an unequivocal message which Israel must comply with without delay.The Court further emphasizes that all other states are required to not assist in the maintenance of the illegal situation created by Israel.
It urges the UN General Assembly and the Security Council to consider measures to help put an end to the illegal presence.
"This places a responsibility on all of us."
https://www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/un-special-session-on-icj-and-israel/id3053833/
........................

"Dette legger et ansvar på oss alle".
DET er Norges offisielle standpunkt.

OSS ALLE, det er .... oss alle.
Ikke minst gjelder det politikere, og politiske partier.
Og det gjelder nasjonalt, kommunalt og lokalt.

Våre lokalaviser har redaksjonelt meldt seg ut, der er det "nærsynet" som gjelder.
Men vi ser nå hvordan krig og ødeleggelser og etnisk rensing rammer oss alle.
Og det begynner med manglende respekt for Humanitær-retten og Folkerett.4. Geneve-konvensjon er fra 1949, basert på lærdommen etter 2. verdenskrig.

Nå skusles denne lærdommen bort.
Heldigvis har vi alle ytringsfriheten.

Kommentar 2:
Jan Marton Jensen 
Det var FN som i 1947 delte Palestina i biter, over hodet på de som bodde der.
Dette utløste den situasjon vi har nå ....
Dermed er det FN , og verdenssamfunnet, som fortsatt har et ansvar for området.

Israel/Palestina-konflikten er også en del av norsk politikk.
Regjeringen har anerkjent Palestina som stat, det har 147 av 193 medlemsland gjort.

MEN i Norge vil  noen av partiene IKKE det.
KrF, FRP og Høyre:  "- Timingen er ikke rett."

Det har snart gått 58 år med brutal okkupasjon ... men "timingen" er fortsatt et problem.
Gaza er snart fullstendig rasert ... IDF tar seg nok tid til det ... "timingen" igjen ...

Det er derfor betimelig, nå når det stunder mot valg av norske politikere, og det disse skal stå for, at en kommunepolitiker på Stord sørger for at det kan bli en debatt også lokalt.

Vi får de politikere vi velger.

 Kommentar 3:
Jan Marton Jensen 
2. mars 2025 hadde filmbransjen Oscar-utdelinger i Los Angeles.
Beste dokumentarfilm var: "No Other Land":
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Culture/land-wins-oscar-best-documentary-feature-film/story?id=119232532

Her dokumenteres Israels mangeårige og systematiske ødeleggelse av lokalsamfunn i Masafer Yatta ved Hebron.

Overgriperne kalles "bosettere", men de er etter loven kriminelle, ja krigsforbrytere ifølge Folkeretten (4. Geneve-konvensjon 49.6)

Overgriperne har støtte av IDF, som noen mener er verdens meste moralske hær.
Her er det motsatt.

"No Other Land" viser en stats politikk, som okkupant, ved militærmakt og pogromer, over mange år for å fjerne palestinerne der fra sin bopeler. 
Dette er metodisk etnisk rensing og terror.

Ord er viktig
Derfor er dokumentasjon viktig.

"No Other Land" burde ses av alle som ønsker innsikt.
Så kunne man etterpå delta i debatt med de ord som er beskrivende.
Og de som ville stille i T-skjorte med "No Other Land" kunne gjøre det. 
Gjerne i møter i kommunestyret ...

 
 
Skudeneshavn  13. april 2025

Jan Marton Jensen
 


torsdag 6. februar 2025

Debatt i Aftenposten om ICJ - Min kommentar

Debatt i Aftenposten om ICJ sin dom av 19. juli 2024, se Kilde.

Israels 57-årige okkupasjon av palestinske områder ble av ICJ erklært ulovlig.

 

Min kommentar:

Jan Marton Jensen
svarte Helge Christophersen 
for noen sekunder siden

ICJ har 19. juli 2024 konkludert om gjeldende folkerett hva gjelder Israels 57-årige okkupasjon av palestinske områder.

Okkupasjonen er ulovlig, og stater må følge dette opp.

I Israel er man klar over tilstanden:

"The ICJ Advisory Opinion and Israeli Law"

"The ICJ Advisory opinion and the duty to distinguish between Israel and the Occupied Territories"

https://verfassungsblog.de/the-icj-advisory-opinion-and-israeli-law/

 

EDIT:
Innlegget er foreløpig klokka 12.17 ikke synlig, det er moderert bort av Aftenposten.
Regner med at det kommer på plass ganske snart.
På plass 12.20

12.34 borte igjen ... Hva skjer?
12.36 på plass igjen ...
12.58 borte igjen ...

13.50 på plass igjen

 

 

Skudeneshavn   6. februar 2025

Jan Marton Jensen

 

Kilde:
6. februar 2025
https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/i/254w4x/kritikk-boer-vaere-faglig-holdbar
 

17. oktober 2024
https://verfassungsblog.de/the-icj-advisory-opinion-and-israeli-law/

 

torsdag 12. desember 2024

ICJ sin dom av 19. juli 2024 om Israels okkupasjon av palestinske områder

Melding fra ICJ, se Kilde.

"Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024"

"Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem"

Utdrag:

"The sustained abuse by Israel of its position as an occupying Power, through annexation and an assertion of permanent control over the Occupied Palestinian Territory and continued frustration of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, violates fundamental principles of international law and renders Israel’s presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory unlawful."

 Klar melding fra ICJ at Israels okkupasjon er ulovlig og må opphøre.

 

Skudeneshavn  12. desember 2024

Jan Marton Jensen

 

Kilde:
19. juli 2024
https://www.icj-cij.org/node/204176

fredag 29. november 2024

Israels planer for Gaza-stripen: Langvarig okkupasjon og tilstedeværelse

 Artikkel i The Guardian 29. november 2024, se Kilde:

"Israeli military to remain in Gaza for years, food minister says"

"Avi Dichter, of Israel’s security cabinet, made the comments as reports of the scale of Israel’s military infrastructure in the territory emerge"

Utdrag:
“I think that we are going to stay in Gaza for a long time. I think most people understand that [Israel] will be years in some kind of West Bank situation where you go in and out and maybe you remain along Netzarim [corridor],” Dichter said."

Klar melding.
Gaza skal være som Vestbredden, under full kontroll av IDF.
Store områder skal være ubebodd, for redusere områder som må overvåkes.
Gaza-folket skal bo i flyktningeleirer.

Tydeligvis har IDF "god erfaring" med Vestbredden.
Og ICJ sin dom fra 19.juli ... Israel bryr seg ikke.

Det er liten tvil om at det må ytre press og krefter for å komme på et annet spor i MØ, der det er en løsning for palestinerne.

Skudeneshavn   29. november 2024

Jan Marton Jensen

Kilde:
29. november 2024
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/nov/29/israeli-military-to-remain-in-gaza-for-years-food-minister-says

tirsdag 8. august 2023

Okkupasjon: "Elefanten i rommet"

Opprop.

Innledning:

"The Elephant in the Room"

We, academics and other public figures from Israel/Palestine and abroad, call attention to the direct link between Israel’s recent attack on the judiciary and its illegal occupation of millions of Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Palestinian people lack almost all basic rights, including the right to vote and protest. They face constant violence: this year alone, Israeli forces have killed over 190 Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza and demolished over 590 structures. Settler vigilantes burn, loot, and kill with impunity.

Without equal rights for all, whether in one state, two states, or in some other political framework, there is always a danger of dictatorship. There cannot be democracy for Jews in Israel as long as Palestinians live under a regime of apartheid, as Israeli legal experts have described it. Indeed, the ultimate purpose of the judicial overhaul is to tighten restrictions on Gaza, deprive Palestinians of equal rights both beyond the Green Line and within it, annex more land, and ethnically cleanse all territories under Israeli rule of their Palestinian population. The problems did not start with the current radical government: Jewish supremacism has been growing for years and was enshrined in law by the 2018 Nation State Law."

Se hele oppropet under Kilde.
Pr 8. august er er 750 + underskrifter.

Skudeneshavn  8. august 2023

Jan Marton Jensen


Kilde:

https://sites.google.com/view/israel-elephant-in-the-room/home

fredag 12. mai 2023

Innsiktsfull artikkel fra 2021 av Natan Sachs om israelsk politikk

Innsiktsfull artikkel fra 2021 av Natan Sachs om israelsk politikk.

Åpningshistorien fra 1967 med president Johnson i diskusjon med Levi Eshkol er interessant.
Her angis at israelsk politikk mht palestinerne allerede da ... det er å ikke ha noen politikk.

Men politikk blir til mens man okkuperer, som det har vist seg.

 Skudeneshavn  12. mai 2023

Jan Marton Jensen


Kilde:

23. juni 2021
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2021/06/23/israels-new-government-agrees-on-only-one-thing-booting-netanyahu/

torsdag 17. november 2022

Israelsk vurdering av FNs ICJ-vedtak

Twittermelding 17. november 2022:

Israelsk realist om FNs ICJ-vedtak: "Shany points to the “open-ended nature” of the occupation, as well as “demographic engineering” and “policies of de-facto annexation,” in precipitating this shift." haaretz.com/israel-news/20

 

Skudeneshavn   17. november 2022

Jan Marton Jensen

 

På Twitter:
17. november 2022
https://twitter.com/janmarton/status/1593168794884923393

 

Kilde:
15. november 2022
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2022-11-15/ty-article/.premium/israels-occupation-and-the-international-court-of-justice-what-happens-next/00000184-7b5c-d6bd-a9fc-7bdf23260000

søndag 12. juni 2022

- Vi er alle okkupanter

Tankevekkende artikkel av den israelske jurist Michael Sfard i Haaretz den 8. juni 2022:
- Vi er alle okkupanter
 
Hele artikkelen nederst her.

 
 
 
Skudeneshavn  12. juni 2022
 
Jan Marton Jensen 

Kilde:
8. juni 2022
 
 
HELE artikkelen i Haaaretz 8. juni 2022
 
Opinion | 

We Are All Herzogs, We Are All Occupiers

 
An Israeli soldier argues with Palestinian demonstrators during a protest against Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, Monday.
An Israeli soldier argues with Palestinian demonstrators during a protest against Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, Monday.Credit: RANEEN SAWAFTA/ REUTERS

The baby who was born the day that Maj. Gen. Chaim Herzog signed a proclamation declaring pompously that “the Israel Defense Forces entered the region today and assumed control, security and public order” celebrated his 55th birthday this week.

As the newborn drew his first breaths and his mother gave him his first caressing human touch, the general was swaying, drunk on a dizzying power trip: “All authority of government, legislation, appointment and administration pertaining to the region or its residents will now be exclusively in my hands and will be exercised only by me or by any person appointed therefore by me or acting on my behalf,” he declared. 

And lest there be any doubt about his omnipotence, about his being a sole ruler with no restrictions in the territory that his/our forces had just conquered, he established that any legal obligation to consult or receive authorization from others for appointments or legislation "hereby void.” Yitzhak Rabin’s famous “I will decide, I will navigate” – the occupation version.

The first Palestinian baby of the occupation was born into the dictatorship of Maj. Gen. Chaim Herzog, who went on to become Israel’s sixth president; his son Isaac now serves as the 11th. 

From the very first day of this baby’s life – we’ll call him Abd, “servant” in Arabic - though not like Abdullah, meaning 'servant of God' in Arabic, and more like Abd-Israel – Herzog Sr. demonstrated his authority over him, his parents and the hundreds of thousands of his people living in the occupied territory: “I hereby declare,” he announced in the second part of the proclamation, which sent military jeeps to patrol the streets of  Palestinian cities on June 7, 1967, “a curfew throughout the region.” And for those with poor reading comprehension, he added: “No one shall leave his home at any time during the day or the night.”

Our Abd was born into a tyrannical occupation and has lived in it his entire life. He has never experienced a single minute of freedom, one second of sovereignty.

In the years after his birth, his first ruler, Herzog, established his successful law firm with his partners Michael Fox and Yaakov Neeman, advanced a political career that culminated in the Knesset electing him president of the Jewish state, pardoned Shin Bet security service agents who had tortured Palestinian detainees and perjured themselves in court, and who three times commuted the life prison term of a member of the Jewish terrorist underground who had murdered Palestinian university students, and attempted to murder the mayors of West Bank Palestinian cities and Palestinian bus passengers. 

In these years, the course of Abd’s life was dictated by an absence of civil rights as a result of living under the Israeli occupation and his subordination to Herzog and his successors.

It was they who decided what would happen to his family’s lands, whether he would get a permit to build a home, and if he could travel abroad for vacation or studies. And it was they who prohibited all political activity, defined any criticism of the government as incitement, jailed tens of thousands of Palestinians – some of them without trial – and even outlawed human rights organizations, classifying them as terrorist organizations.

In his teenage years, Abd saw how the landscape of his homeland changed completely. He saw how hundreds of thousands of acres of farmland were expropriated and new communities with alien, European architecture took over the space.

He watched the arrival of new residents, who brought with them a mentality of being lords of the land and who received from “the Herzogs” everything that had been taken from his family and his community: land, water, natural resources, participation in decision-making and, of course, dignity.

Half a million settlers and two intifadas later, Herzog Jr. began his presidency by visiting the Har Bracha settlement, where he inaugurated an ulpana – a religious girls’ high school – and lit Hanukkah candles at the site where a Jewish physician massacred Muslim worshipers, the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron. He did not visit Abd, and did not inaugurate anything in his village.

So don’t say Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, say Herzog. From Chaim Herzog to Isaac Herzog, it is the Israeli establishment, not its fringes, that expropriates land, builds settlements, re-engineers the demographics of the occupied territory, brutally throttles all opposition to its rule, including nonviolent resistance, and inflicts disaster on Abd and his people.

The Herzogs may not be deluded messianists, but even through the Cambridge-inflected Irish accent, they exude Jewish supremacy in their deeds. They (we) may not hang the picture of the Hebron murderer in our living rooms, but we are the effective occupiers and dispossessors, not they.

So while not all of us are Ben-Gvirs, we are all Herzogs. And besides, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich are our legitimate children, fruit of the tree that we all poisoned. To focus on them is to blame the stone and absolve the person who threw it.

Abd is 55. He lives in a full apartheid state that all of us, we Israelis, created, including those who consider themselves very distant from the crazies in Hebron. The Israelis who work in high-tech, who march in Pride parades, and each and every lawyer at Herzog, Fox & Neeman – we all impose the curfew on Abd. 

We all divert all of his land’s natural resources to his settler neighbors at his expense, merely because he is a Palestinian, and they are Jews. We are all signatories to a government whose institutions are designed to serve its Jewish neighbors and that subjugate him for this end, only because he is Palestinian, and they are Jewish.

We have all created a system with one separate and distinct law for settlers, who also help write it, only because he is a Palestinian, and they are Jews. Will he be forced to live out the rest of his days like this? That depends almost entirely on us.

Welcome to the 56th year.

Michael Sfard is a lawyer who represents one of the Palestinian human rights organizations that Israel outlawed as a terrorist organization, as mentioned above.

 

tirsdag 12. april 2022

- "Israel Prevented 15 Terror Attacks, but How Many Did It Cause?"

 Interessant artikkel i Haaretz 12. april 2022:

- "Israel Prevented 15 Terror Attacks, but How Many Did It Cause?" 

Myndighetene i Israel angir hvor mange terror-angrep man nylig har stanset.
Skribenten spør hvor mange kommende terror-angrep har man skapt?

Og så går han grundig gjennom alle de prøvelser og ydmykelser som  palestinerne utsettes for under den brutale okkupasjonen ... og som vil ha påvirkning på menneskene der.

HELE artikkelen nedenfor her.
Skribenten er klar på hva han mener om IDF's oppførsel.


Skudeneshavn   12.april 2022

Jan Marton Jensen

 

Kilde:

12.april 2022
https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-you-thwarted-15-terror-attacks-good-for-you-1.10735669

HELE artikkelen i Haaretz 12. april 2022:

Israel Prevented 15 Terror Attacks, but How Many Did It Cause?

 

Israeli forces at Damascus Gate in Jerusalem at an event marking the beginning of the month of Ramadan in April
Israeli forces at Damascus Gate in Jerusalem at an event marking the beginning of the month of Ramadan in AprilCredit: Ohad Zwigenberg

The story is always the same: Following a bloody terror attack, the prime minister, defense minister and chief of staff stand before the microphones and proudly announce how many terror attacks had been prevented in the weeks leading up to the attack that was not prevented.

The nation should know that its guardians are as alert as ever, and that it’s just that the terrorists refuse to cooperate with Israel’s deterrence and counterterrorism efforts.

It was the same last week. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett declared that 15 attacks had been prevented, Chief of Staff Aviv Kochavi spoke of “at least 10” and Defense Minister Benny Gantz touted 200 arrests, and promised he was ready to make thousands. This is all very impressive, but one statistic was not relayed to the public for some reason, namely how many attacks were caused by all these mighty efforts to thwart, prevent and deter.

The attackers don’t set out to do harm just out of boredom. And, contrary to popular belief, they are not determined to wipe out the entire Jewish people, just like the fighters of the Jewish pre-state militias were not out to wipe out the entire British people, Algeria’s FLN had no intentions of exterminating the French people and French Resistance fighters had no intention of finishing off each and every German.

All of the above committed attacks because they were occupied, because their liberty and their rights had been stolen from them, because they had been severely abused by the occupiers’ acts of prevention and deterrence.

For example, think of the common Israeli practice of raiding homes in the middle of the night, pulling youngsters out of their beds, beating them up and handing them over to investigators who threaten them and put them through the wringer. How many terror attacks has this practice prevented and how many has it given rise to?

Or the lovely custom of demolishing the homes of innocent people because someone in the family was involved in a terror attack. This surely deters people. But how many of them will decide to pick up a kitchen knife and avenge the family that was left homeless?

And the regular abuses by the local “captain” of those subject to his arbitrary authority, how many attacks have they foiled and how many have they caused?

And the humiliation of parents in front of their children, and the serial theft of land for punks from the settlements, and the blackmailing of those seeking medical treatment so they’ll act as collaborators, and the denial of work permits, the negation of any chance of a decent life, the endless abuse at the checkpoints, the torture in the interrogation rooms and the dozens of bodies that were taken from their families and kept in refrigerators (Punishment? Evil? Bargaining material? The devil only knows). Not to mention the appalling ease with which killing is done, as if this was just bird-hunting. How many attacks has the aggregation of all these things prevented, and how many has it wrought?

Logic therefore requires that, whenever the politicians laud the number of attacks that have been prevented, the public should also be informed about the other side of the coin. It could go something like this: “In the past few months, the security forces prevented 18 terror attacks, and created pretexts for 179 new terror attacks. Five of those occurred this month. A statement will be made about the other attacks after they are committed.”

This is precisely the trap for every occupier: The more actions it takes “to thwart, prevent and deter,” the more pretexts for attacks these actions create. And the more attacks there are, the more the efforts to thwart, prevent and deter increase. So it goes ad nauseam, until the occupation ends or catastrophe occurs.

Once upon a time, years ago, there was one way out of this vicious cycle – through genocide, as the Spaniards committed with the Aztecs and Incas, the Americans with the Native Americans and the Australians with the Aborigines. To the dismay of many Israelis, this method is no longer in fashion. It has lost its charm. What a shame our current occupation didn’t happen back in the days of Yehoshua Bin-Nun.

tirsdag 5. april 2022

Okkupasjon korrumperer okkupanten

B. Michael peker i et innlegg i Haaretz den 5. april på hvordan langvarig okkupasjon påvirker okkupanten:

"There Is No Such Thing as a Free Occupation, nor Even a Cheap One" 

 Han konkluderer:

"I remember a country in which all of the above had not yet become yawn-inducing routine.
A country that had not yet been corrupted or turned ugly, losing its soul and conscience. A country that had some chance of being normal and humane. This chance was also taken away by the occupation."

......................

Skudeneshavn  5. april 2022   / 10 mai 2023

Jan Marton Jensen 

På Twitter:
11. mai 2023
https://twitter.com/janmarton/status/1656331010512936960

Ny info:
10. mai 2023
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-05-10/ty-article/.premium/5-000-trees-vandalized-in-palestinian-west-bank-villages-in-less-than-five-months/00000188-00b8-de69-a3ac-befb50690000

 

Kilde:
5. april 2022
https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/.premium-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-free-occupation-nor-even-a-cheap-one-1.10719997 

18. mars 2022
https://miff.no/samfunnsliv/2022/03/18israel-karet-til-et-av-verdens-lykkeligste-land.htm

5. januar 2012
https://forskning.no/krig-og-fred-partner-senter-for-internasjonalisering-av-utdanning/lykkelige-israel-ulykkelige-palestina/733757

 

HELE artikkelen i Haaretz 5. april 2022:

There Is No Such Thing as a Free Occupation, nor Even a Cheap One 

Israeli soldiers take part in a raid in Ramallah, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank April 1, 2022.
Israeli soldiers take part in a raid in Ramallah, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank April 1, 2022.  
Credit: REUTERS/Mohamad Torokman

"Waves, being waves, pretty much repeat themselves. Sometimes they’re high, sometimes low. Sometimes fierce, sometimes gentle. Sometimes gladdening, sometimes wistful. At this very moment, yet another wave is washing over us.

It, like all the waves that came before and all the ones to follow, carries with it all the usual components: blood, death, bravery, burial. Deep shock, photogenic shock, resolute leaders, furrowed brows, orchestrated hysteria, a rising and howling rabble. All-day special programming that manages to make even grief and death boring. Herds of hosts who call for censure to prove their patriotism to their public.

Cliches at cemeteries, promises at press conferences. Mobilization of reserve soldiers, “heightened presence,” a show of elite forces. And of course a motley crew of retired generals is brought out of mothballs and given protected tenancy status at the TV studios, where they fill the airwaves with the same pearls of wisdom that got us to where we are today.

This goes on until the all-clear signal. Until routine is resumed. Until the next wave. This is what we’ve grown accustomed to over the past 55 years, convincing ourselves that this is the full cost of the occupation: a few people killed every year, a few days of fear and commotion, and that’s it. Not so terrible. We can live with that.

But there’s no such thing as a free occupation, nor even a cheap one. To correctly determine the full, cumulative cost of the occupation, it’s not enough to price out only current events. One has to drag in the past as well. Those who are old enough can rummage through their memories.

I am old enough. I remember, for example, the first television story (was it by Rafik Halabi?) about an olive tree the Israel Defense Forces had removed in the occupied West Bank. What a commotion it stirred up! It can’t be. That’s impossible, it’s wild slander. “Our army doesn’t uproot trees,” said people shaken by the news. The reporter was almost fired.

I also remember the first time live gunfire was directed at protesters. The first person wounded. The first one killed. I remember the days when the earth quaked when private Palestinian land was stolen by cunning to serve the pagan whim of settlers. I remember a country in which there was no torture (at least not officially), a country in which the army spokesman occasionally spoke the truth. A country that prided itself on its oranges, and not on “stripping” the fertile land of the vanquished and manufacturing weapons of mass destruction and oppressing all who are needy.

I can still remember a country that didn’t have a ghetto for millions of prisoners, as well as millions of disenfranchised people. A country whose army was not an occupying police and whose “armed forces” had not become the suffocating arms of an octopus. That did not brutalize tens of thousands of people daily, that did not compile hit lists or have “target banks.” That did not steal water from the thirsty or demolish the homes of the destitute. That did not deploy legions of sharpshooters to kneecap teens. That did not turn a blind eye to pogrom gangs and in which the Smotriches and Ben-Gvirs were reviled.

I remember a country in which all of the above had not yet become yawn-inducing routine. A country that had not yet been corrupted or turned ugly, losing its soul and conscience. A country that had some chance of being normal and humane. This chance was also taken away by the occupation."