torsdag 12. januar 2023

Hva står Netanyahu sin minister Avi Maoz for?

Det vakte oppsikt da Netanuahu utnevnte Avi Maoz som minister.
Han leder partiet Noam og er en religiøs-konservativ israeler.

Hva han står for er belyst i denne artikkelen i Haaretz 12. januar 2023:
Her kan man sette seg inn i Netanyahu's valg:

"'A Jewish State in All Areas': What Netanyahu's Far-right, anti-LGBTQ Ally Really Believes"

"While Israel’s ultra-Orthodox parties have largely sought to strengthen their communities’ budgets and autonomy, Maoz, as a representative of a messianic strain of religious Zionist Judaism, wants Shabbat to be observed by all Israelis, conversion therapy for LGBTQs to be legalized and women to stay at home."

Skudeneshavn    12 januar 2023

Jan Marton Jensen

Kilde:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avi_Maoz

12. januar 2023
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-01-12/ty-article/.premium/a-jewish-state-in-all-areas-what-netanyahus-far-right-anti-lgbtq-ally-really-believes/00000185-a689-db30-adc7-eedb6fe70000 

28. november 2022
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-63780509

tirsdag 10. januar 2023

Tidligere HRW-leder Kenneth Roth uønsket av Harvard-ledelsen

"Former Human Rights Watch Head Says Harvard Kennedy School Dean Blocked Fellowship Over Israel Criticism

Kenneth Roth, the former executive director of Human Rights Watch, has accused Harvard Kennedy School Dean Douglas W. Elmendorf of blocking him from a year-long fellowship at the school over Roth’s criticism of Israel’s treatment of Palestinians."

Hva tenker ulike akademiske institusjoner om dette?
Og pressen? 

EDIT:
19. januar 2023 i Haaretz:
"Harvard Reverses Decision to Rescind Fellowship to Leading Israel Critic After Weeks of Controversy"

Da har fokus og oppmerksomhet hjulpet.
Harvard kunne ikke opprettholde en slik blokkering av kritiske røster mpt Israel.
Harvards "dean" Elmendorf beklager nå sin feilvurdering ...

Skudeneshavn   10. januar 2023 / 19 janauar 2023

Jan Marton Jensen

På Twitter:
10. januar 2023
https://twitter.com/janmarton/status/1612831913063899138

20. januar 2023
https://twitter.com/janmarton/status/1616433116314206208

 

Ny info:
19. januar 2023
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-01-19/ty-article/harvard-reverses-decision-to-rescind-fellowship-to-leading-israel-critic/00000185-cb1b-d3a8-a3cf-cf3bc6f10000

Kilde:
10. januar 2023
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jan/10/kenneth-roth-human-rights-watch-harvard-israel

9. januar 2023
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2023/1/9/kenneth-roth-hks-fellowship/

mandag 9. januar 2023

- What We Can Learn From Netanyahu's 'Wonderful Friendship' With Bolsonaro

 Analyserende artikkel i Haaretz 9. januar 2023:

"What We Can Learn From Netanyahu's 'Wonderful Friendship' With Bolsonaro"

"When it comes to protecting democracy around the world, Biden is on one side, while Netanyahu huddles with Trump, Putin and Bolsonaro"
(HELE artikkelen nederst under Kilde) 

Artikkelen plasserer Netanyahu i det politiske bildet internasjonalt ... og nevnes sammen med Trump, Bolsonaro og Putin.


Skudeneshavn   9. januar 2023

Jan Marton Jensen

HELE artikkelen i Haaretz 9. januar 2023:

What We Can Learn From Netanyahu's 'Wonderful Friendship' With Bolsonaro

When it comes to protecting democracy around the world, Biden is on one side, while Netanyahu huddles with Trump, Putin and Bolsonaro

Netanyahu and Bolsonaro
Netanyahu and BolsonaroCredit: Palácio do Planalto / Wikimedia Commons, Stringer/ Reuters, Ronen Zvulun/AP, Anastasia Shub

The videos emerging from Brazil’s parliament, Supreme Court and presidential palace on Sunday night were horrifying, but not surprising. The country’s former president, Jair Bolsonaro, has been planting the seeds for months, calling the election that took place in October "rigged" and refusing to accept the victory of his rival, President Luiz Ignacio Lula da Silva.

These images call to mind another video, which appeared in early October on Bolsonaro’s social media accounts – immediately before the first round of voting in Brazil. A man in his early 70s is seen facing the camera. When he starts to talk, he endorses Bolsonaro’s reelection campaign, which by that point was already undermining Brazil’s democracy and spreading dangerous lies and conspiracy theories.

 

https://twitter.com/i/status/1576379329017413633

“Thank you, president Bolsonaro, for your leadership and for strengthening the alliance between our countries,” says the man in the video. “I wish you all the best and thank you again for your wonderful friendship.”

The name of the speaker is Benjamin Netanyahu. Back then, he was the leader of Israel’s opposition. As prime minister, he will have to work with Lula, the socialist leader who defeated his "wonderful friend" Jair.

The Bolsonaristas' coup attempt in Brasilia is an obvious continuation of the January 6 insurrection in the United States, which was inspired and encouraged by another close friend of Netanyahu’s, former U.S. President Donald Trump. Bolsonaro is currently staying in Florida, and according to media reports, members of his circle were consulting with some of Trump’s top advisers in the lead-up to yesterday’s violent attack on his country’s institutions.

Netanyahu’s warm embrace of Trump and Bolsonaro, combined with his new government’s stated intention to avoid any criticism of Putin’s war in Ukraine, paints a clear picture of Israel’s place in today’s global battle over democracy. In fact, as of Monday afternoon, almost a day after the drama in Brasilia, no Israeli official has condemned the violence, even not in the face of direct questions on the subject from Israeli journalists.

The Biden administration, perhaps due to outdated and exaggerated political fears, is pretending not to notice, but the truth is evident and hard to ignore: when it comes to protecting democracy around the world, Biden is on one side, while Netanyahu, together with his buddies Trump and Bolsonaro, is on the other.

 

søndag 8. januar 2023

Informasjon om Israels opptak i FN 11. mai 1949

Israel ble tatt opp som medlem av FN 11. mai 1949.
Det var flere forsøk før dette.
Abba Eban ga flere løfter før Israel ved tredje forsøk ble tatt opp i FN:
Her er informasjon om dette, se Kilde 24. mai 2011:

"Third Time's a Charm: Israel Admitted as U.N. Member in 1949"

 

Skudeneshavn  8. januar 2023

Jan Marton Jensen

 

Kilde:
24. mai 2011
https://www.wrmea.org/011-july/third-time-s-a-charm-israel-admitted-as-u.n.-member-in-1949.html 

11. mai 1949
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/un-general-assembly-resolution-273-iii-may-1949

Israel: - ALT er terror!

 Isreal ser nå alt palestinerne gjør som TERROR.

Det påpeker journalist Noa Landau i en artikkel i Haaretz 8. januar 2023:
(HELE artikkelen nederst under Kilde):

"Israel Sees Palestinian Human Rights Groups as Terrorist Organizations"

Når humanitær virksomhet blir "terror" ...
Når diplomatisk virksomhet blir "terror" ...
Når juridisk virksomhet blir "terror" ...

... DA mister ordet terror sitt innhold.
Og  det blir snarere avsenderen som ikler seg begrepet.


Skudeneshavn  8. januar 2023

Jan Marton Jensen 


På Twitter:
8. januar 2023
https://twitter.com/janmarton/status/1612043630121816064

18. mars 2024
https://twitter.com/janmarton/status/1769765512769122600

Kilde:
8. januar 2023
https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2023-01-08/ty-article-opinion/.premium/israel-sees-palestinian-human-rights-groups-as-terrorist-organizations/00000185-8df8-da33-a9e7-edf9ff7a0000

HELE artikkelen i Haaretz:

Israel Sees Palestinian Human Rights Groups as Terrorist Organizations

UKRAINE-CRISIS/UN    DAVID DEE DELGADO/רויטרס
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia in October.Credit: DAVID DEE DELGADO/REUTERS

Among the myriad problems in the security cabinet’s decision to “punish” the Palestinians for their diplomatic efforts to fight the occupation was one particularly dangerous and harsh element. Part 5 of the summary of the cabinet’s decision states: “Actions will be taken against organizations in Judea and Samaria that promote terror activities or any hostile activity, including diplomatic-judicial action against Israel in the guise of humanitarian activities.”

The significance of this decision is an official declaration of war on all Palestinian civil society groups fighting the Israeli occupation by peaceful means. No more legal squirming to find shaky evidence connecting Palestinian human rights groups to terror, as former Defense Minister Benny Gantz did with regard to the seven organizations that he recently outlawed in a decision that many countries still consider strange.

 

Instead of bothering to invent such indirect connections, the Israeli government simply declares in black and white that as far as it is concerned, all diplomatic and judicial action, that is, non-violent opposition, is fundamentally “hostile” and in the same bracket as terrorism.

In other words, to the Israel of today, Palestinian diplomatic activity is diplomatic terror, Palestinian court appeals are judicial terror, pro-Palestinian boycotts of goods are economic terror, a Palestinian demonstration is terror against public order, and a Palestinian protest song is musical incitement to terror.

Of course, the same goes for Palestinian democratic opposition at the ballot box. From Israel’s perspective, this is demographic terror. As playwright Hanoch Levin put it in “Security Instructions in the Occupied Territories”: “A man walking down the street glancing nervously from side to side and over his shoulder shall be suspected of being an Arab terrorist; a man walking down the street and looking calmly ahead of him shall be suspected of being a level-headed Arab terrorist.”

According to Israel, the Palestinian people have no legitimate or legal way to fight to achieve its national aspirations, because Israel isn’t really just fighting Arab terror, it is fighting the Palestinian national struggle – in any form it takes.

This decision is utterly absurd not only because it gives the same weight, legally and morally, to violent opposition and non-violent opposition (according to Israel, both are equally prohibited), but also because it empties the meaning out of the Israeli definition of terror.

When the world sees that Israel shutters Palestinian human rights groups charged with “hostile diplomatic activity” or “hostile judicial activity,” or organizations whose only sin is “humanitarian activity,” which to Israel is “in the guise of” general hostility – what will they think of the Israeli claim toward other organizations it will define as “terror organizations” over the years?

 

A man works inside the Palestinian civil society group Addameer, which was designated by Israel as a terrorist organization along with other five groups, in Ramallah, in the 2021.
A man works inside the Palestinian civil society group Addameer, which was designated by Israel as a terrorist organization along with other five groups, in Ramallah, in the 2021.Credit: MOHAMAD TOROKMAN / REUTERS

 Israel erases the differences between these categories with its own two hands. In the case of the seven organizations that were recently outlawed, perhaps that was for the best. Israel is now helping the countries that donate to them belittle Israel’s definitions of terror and continue to contribute to them.

If the cabinet’s decision is to treat all Palestinian civil society groups as terror organizations (although it is not clear exactly what “actions” will be taken against them), this will be a major test for the human rights groups on the other side of the Green Line.

We need solidarity not only because it’s the right thing to do, but also because the norms and practices of such persecution never stop in the territories; they always creep into Israel itself. Equating civil activities to terror will not stop with the Palestinians. It will trickle first to Palestinian organizations within Israel, and then, of course, to Jewish leftist groups.

 

lørdag 7. januar 2023

- Israel vedtar harde straffetiltak mot palestinerne - Diskusjon i Aftenposten

NTB-artikkel i Aftenposten 7. januar 2023:

"Israel vedtar harde straffetiltak mot palestinerne"

"Israels regjering har vedtatt en rekke nye straffetiltak mot Palestina som svar på at de har bedt FNs øverste juridiske organ om å granske okkupasjonen."

EN av kommentar lagt inn til artikkelen 7. januar 2023:

"Jan Marton Jensen
for tolv minutter siden

I denne saken konkluderte ICJ i Haag om "krigens rett" allerede den 9. juli 2004. Dessverre har Vesten tillat Israel å FORTSETTE å uthule folkeretten ved krig og okkupasjon nå i ytterligere snart 20 år.

Reaksjonene ved Russlands okkupasjon og angrep på Ukraina stiller dette i et grelt lys."

 

Ytterligere en kommentar lagt inn 10. januar 2023:

"Jan Marton Jensen
svarte Arne Jensen 
for noen sekunder siden

Som angitt blir Israels okkupasjon ulovlig ved den FORM den utøves. Eksempel: I område C på den okkuperte Vestbredden har 400.000 israelske såkalte "settlere" ulovlig slått seg ned. Dette er brudd på folkeretten: 4 Geneve-konvensjon 49.6, i kapitlet for Krigsforbrytelser.

Det grove nå om dagen er at Netanyahu har tatt LEDERE for disse krigsforbryterne inn i regjeringen, og der latt dem styre okkupasjonen. Vi ser allerede i den artikkelen vi her diskuterer hvordan Netanyahu nå driver Israel mot enda mer kynisk undertrykkelse av palestinerne."

 


Skudeneshavn  7. januar 2023 / 10. januar 2023

Jan Marton Jensen

Kilde:
7. januar 2023
https://www.aftenposten.no/verden/i/zEMvw5/israel-vedtar-harde-straffetiltak-mot-palestinerne

torsdag 5. januar 2023

Debattinnlegg om Grunnrenteskatt på havbruk: "Lakseskatt"

To debattinnlegg i Haugesunds Avis, se Kilde  er kommentert av meg.
Kommentarene finnes under den enkelte artikkel.

Det pekes på at grunnrente-utredningen ble gjort under Erna Solberg sin regjering.
Men hun valgte ikke å følge dette opp.

:::::::::::::::::

EN av  mine kommentarer fra november 2022 til Østensjø:
"Det faglige grunnlaget for skattlegging av havbruksnæringen er gitt i NOU 2019-18:

"Skattlegging av havbruksvirksomhet":
https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/207ae51e0f6a44b6b65a2cec192105ed/no/pdfs/nou201920190018000dddpdfs.pdf

Utvalget som ga denne innstillingen i november 2019 ble nedsatt av Solberg-regjeringen i 2018.
Utvalgsleder var professor Karen Helene Ulltveit-Moe.
Et flertall i utvalget gikk inn for en "overskuddsbasert grunnrenteskatt".

Utredningen er grundig, på hele 230 sider.
Og det er den faglige flertallsanbefalingen som nå følges opp."
:::::::::::::::::::
 
EN av mine kommentarer fra januar 2023 til Ropstad:
"Laksemilliardene har strømmet inn til eierne ... og nå truer flere med å flytte til Sveits.
Når slik de rike velger å flytte fra landet som har lagt grunnlaget for deres rikdom ... da oppstår flere spørsmål.
Og det er her KrF kunne utgjort en forskjell, basert på sitt verdigrunnlag om solidaritet og mindre ulikhet mellom fattig og rik.

Det er dessverre uklart om Ropstad er opptatt av dette.
I en situasjon der grunnlaget for en grunnrentebeskatning på havbruk kunne vært gjort av den regjering han støttet, så bli nå KrF kun et ekko av Høyre".

 

Skudeneshavn  5. januar 2023

 Jan Marton Jensen

 

Kilde:

"Skattlegging av havbruksvirksomhet":
https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/207ae51e0f6a44b6b65a2cec192105ed/no/pdfs/nou201920190018000dddpdfs.pdf

30. desember 2022
Kjell Ingolf Ropstad,
finanspolitisk talsperson i KrF
"Utsett innføringen av lakseskatten"
https://www.h-avis.no/utsett-innforingen-av-lakseskatten/o/5-62-1463303 

 

21. november 2022
Harald Østenshø, Haugesund Høyre
"Er ressurs-/grunnrentebeskatning på havbruk mulig?"
https://www.h-avis.no/er-ressurs-grunnrentebeskatning-pa-havbruk-mulig/o/5-62-1445974